URUGUAY: Loss of trust as reasonable cause for termination of Distribution Agreements in Uruguay.

It was recently discussed, in a judicial case in Uruguay (FORTYLEX S.A. v SOCIEDAD COMERCIAL E IMPORTADORA ENKO LTDA.), involving a supplier and a distributor of an international brand of lighters (RONSON), an issue about the circumstances that can legally lead to a termination for a reasonable cause. Under Uruguayan legislation, there is no definition […]

Read More…

FRANCE: TERMINATION OF AN EXCLUSIVE DISTRIBUTION CONTRACT BY A MOTORCYCLE IMPORTER AND RESTRICTIVE COMPETITION PRACTICES: A decision in favour of importers in matters of termination of relationship, wrongful termination and imposition of unbalanced obligations.

Ref: Paris Court of Appeal, Section 5, Ch. 4, 26 June 2024, RG no. 22/01389 A motorcycle importer had had a contractual relationship with its exclusive distributor since 1994. On 9 October 2017, the importer terminated the contract with its distributor, giving notice ending on 30 September 2018 and informing the distributor that a new […]

Read More…

COLOMBIA: RECENT CASE LAW REGARDING COMMERCIAL AGENCY VS EMPLOYMENT CONTRACTS IN COLOMBIA.

One of the most recent cases regarding commercial agency agreements in Colombia involves the Supreme Court’s distinction between an employment contract and a commercial agency agreement. This article will discusses decision No. SL1642-2024 by the Supreme Court of Justice issued on April 29, 2024.[1]   Background of the case Hernán Vargas Lozano filed a lawsuit […]

Read More…

UK: UK government’s consultation on abolition of Commercial Agents Regulations – implications and how to participate

Key takeaways New government consultation launched proposing to abolish the Commercial Agents Regulations. The Commercial Agents Regulations have been in force since 1 January 1994, pursuant to an EU-wide directive. They provide important statutory protection to agents, including a right to a goodwill termination payment. If the government proceeds with its plans, it will have […]

Read More…

EU: Is resale price maintenance still strictly prohibited? Does the Super Bock case of the Court of Justice leave space for a less rigid approach?

  Introduction The EU Commission has always taken a very strict approach on the issue of resale price maintenance, leaving practically no space for exceptions in cases where a certain control over resale prices by members of the distribution network would be necessary for avoiding aggressive price competition, which has been made easier by the […]

Read More…

ITALY: Franchising contracts and minimum duration of 3 years

The Italian Supreme Court has finally confirmed an important principle, previously expressed by some lower Courts, which remedies a probable mistake made when approving Law 129 of 2004 (Italian Franchising Law). Article 3.3 of Law 129/2004 provides that the franchise contract must have a minimum duration of three years in order to allow the franchisee […]

Read More…

NORWAY: HOW CLOSE SHOULD YOU GET? Balancing transparency with protection

Balancing transparency with protection is an essential element in most distributor-principal relationship. Generally, the principal brings product knowledge and the distributor provide market knowledge. But the roles are often more complex. Adapting product to local markets or introducing new solutions requires that both parties participate in technical as well as market considerations.  And often cooperation […]

Read More…

ISRAEL: Supreme Court – commercial agent is entitled to a “decent fee” for his assistance to the principal after the agreement between them ended, but if the (former) agent neglected to agree on the specific fee for his service and, consequently, the parties were involved in lengthy and costly legal proceedings, his fee would be reduced.

The agent was appointed in order to promote the sales of specific machines of the principal (a foreign company). Under the agreement, the agent was entitled to a commission of 25% of the sales proceeds. Several years later, the main customer, the Airports Authority, decided to terminate the agreement with the principal and entered into […]

Read More…

INDIA: Provisions of the Arbitration Act supersede institutional arbitration rules

The Bombay High Court recently held in a judgement dated 26th February 2024 that the provisions of the (Indian) Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“Arbitration Act”) would supersede any institutional arbitration rules that parties to a contract choose by way of an arbitration agreement or clause. In the present case, two parties to a sale […]

Read More…

FRANCE: By decision n° 23-D-13 dated 19 December 2023 (the “Decision”), the French Competition Authority (the “FCA”) fined Rolex France SAS, as perpetrator, jointly and severally with Rolex Holding SA and the Hans Wilsdorf Foundation, as parent companies, a total of 91,600,000 euros for prohibiting its selected distributors from selling its luxury watches online.

This Decision follows the referrals made in January 2017 by the professional organisation Union de la Bijouterie Horlogerie and the company Pellegrin & Fils. These referrals come in the context of a dispute between Rolex France and its distributors following the network head’s wish to restructure its distribution network in France, which involves reducing the […]

Read More…

BULGARIA: New block exemption decision adopted by the Bulgarian Competition Protection Commission

On 11 January 2024, the Bulgarian Competition Protection Commission (the ‘Commission’) officially adopted a new Block Exemption Decision (the ‘Decision’) of certain categories of agreements, decisions and concerted practices. 1. Prohibited Agreements and Block Exemption Article 15 of the Bulgarian Competition Protection Act (the ‘Act’) prohibits all agreements between undertakings, decisions by associations of undertakings […]

Read More…

BELGIUM: Decision of the Belgian Supreme Court on of “pre-contractual information obligations” in a franchise agreement

On June 2, 2023, the Belgian Supreme Court has ruled in a matter concerning the breach of “pre-contractual information obligations” in a franchise agreement. Pursuant to Article 3 of the Law of December 19, 2005 concerning “pre-contractual information in commercial cooperation agreements”, (as revised by article 4, 2° of the law of April 2, 2014), […]

Read More…

TURKEY: Decision of the 11th Chamber of the Turkish Supreme Court Assessing the Penalty Clause and Termination Fee within the Franchise Agreement.

The lawsuit is related to the claim of the franchisor for the collection of the franchise fees for the remaining term of the franchise agreement together along with the penalty clause based on the claim that the franchise agreement between the parties has been terminated by the franchisee without any justifiable ground. The Court of […]

Read More…

BELGIUM: Decision of the Belgian Supreme Court on an explicit termination clause.

On May 11, 2023, the Belgian Supreme Court has ruled in a matter concerning the immediate termination of a distribution agreement, based on an explicit termination clause. The case concerned the termination of a distribution agreement by Rolex. A contract clause allowed Rolex not only to terminate the agreement in case of contractual breach, but […]

Read More…