INDIA: Recent judicial developments relating to Intellectual Property and Brand Protection in India.

Lacoste obtains favourable judgement in trademark infringement suit The Delhi High Court, in a judgement dated the 14th of August 2024, ruled in the favour of Lacoste to end a 23-year long suit regarding the infringement of Lacoste’s crocodile logo. The initial suit was filed by Lacoste against Singapore’s Crocodile International Pte Limited and its […]

Read More…

BELGIUM: Belgium amends Pre-Contractual Disclosure Requirements (Again)

On 11 September 2024, the Moniteur Belge (Belgian Official Gazette) published a Royal Decree introducing yet another amendment to the pre-contractual information requirements for commercial cooperation agreements[1] under Belgium’s Disclosure Act, which is incorporated in the Belgian Code of Economic Law (“BCEL”). The Royal Decree, adopted on 19 August 2024, adds four new elements of […]

Read More…

CANADA: Seven Lessons from the “Paramount Trilogy”

Nearly seven years after it began, the “Paramount Trilogy” has now concluded. The trial[1] and appeal[2] decisions have significantly advanced the law with respect to statutory rescission under Section 6(2) of the Wishart Act.[3]  This article attempts to identify the most important aspects of these decisions and to identify, where applicable, new developments in the […]

Read More…

URUGUAY: Loss of trust as reasonable cause for termination of Distribution Agreements in Uruguay.

It was recently discussed, in a judicial case in Uruguay (FORTYLEX S.A. v SOCIEDAD COMERCIAL E IMPORTADORA ENKO LTDA.), involving a supplier and a distributor of an international brand of lighters (RONSON), an issue about the circumstances that can legally lead to a termination for a reasonable cause. Under Uruguayan legislation, there is no definition […]

Read More…

FRANCE: TERMINATION OF AN EXCLUSIVE DISTRIBUTION CONTRACT BY A MOTORCYCLE IMPORTER AND RESTRICTIVE COMPETITION PRACTICES: A decision in favour of importers in matters of termination of relationship, wrongful termination and imposition of unbalanced obligations.

Ref: Paris Court of Appeal, Section 5, Ch. 4, 26 June 2024, RG no. 22/01389 A motorcycle importer had had a contractual relationship with its exclusive distributor since 1994. On 9 October 2017, the importer terminated the contract with its distributor, giving notice ending on 30 September 2018 and informing the distributor that a new […]

Read More…

COLOMBIA: RECENT CASE LAW REGARDING COMMERCIAL AGENCY VS EMPLOYMENT CONTRACTS IN COLOMBIA.

One of the most recent cases regarding commercial agency agreements in Colombia involves the Supreme Court’s distinction between an employment contract and a commercial agency agreement. This article will discusses decision No. SL1642-2024 by the Supreme Court of Justice issued on April 29, 2024.[1]   Background of the case Hernán Vargas Lozano filed a lawsuit […]

Read More…

UK: UK government’s consultation on abolition of Commercial Agents Regulations – implications and how to participate

Key takeaways New government consultation launched proposing to abolish the Commercial Agents Regulations. The Commercial Agents Regulations have been in force since 1 January 1994, pursuant to an EU-wide directive. They provide important statutory protection to agents, including a right to a goodwill termination payment. If the government proceeds with its plans, it will have […]

Read More…

EU: Is resale price maintenance still strictly prohibited? Does the Super Bock case of the Court of Justice leave space for a less rigid approach?

  Introduction The EU Commission has always taken a very strict approach on the issue of resale price maintenance, leaving practically no space for exceptions in cases where a certain control over resale prices by members of the distribution network would be necessary for avoiding aggressive price competition, which has been made easier by the […]

Read More…

ITALY: Franchising contracts and minimum duration of 3 years

The Italian Supreme Court has finally confirmed an important principle, previously expressed by some lower Courts, which remedies a probable mistake made when approving Law 129 of 2004 (Italian Franchising Law). Article 3.3 of Law 129/2004 provides that the franchise contract must have a minimum duration of three years in order to allow the franchisee […]

Read More…

NORWAY: HOW CLOSE SHOULD YOU GET? Balancing transparency with protection

Balancing transparency with protection is an essential element in most distributor-principal relationship. Generally, the principal brings product knowledge and the distributor provide market knowledge. But the roles are often more complex. Adapting product to local markets or introducing new solutions requires that both parties participate in technical as well as market considerations.  And often cooperation […]

Read More…

ISRAEL: Supreme Court – commercial agent is entitled to a “decent fee” for his assistance to the principal after the agreement between them ended, but if the (former) agent neglected to agree on the specific fee for his service and, consequently, the parties were involved in lengthy and costly legal proceedings, his fee would be reduced.

The agent was appointed in order to promote the sales of specific machines of the principal (a foreign company). Under the agreement, the agent was entitled to a commission of 25% of the sales proceeds. Several years later, the main customer, the Airports Authority, decided to terminate the agreement with the principal and entered into […]

Read More…

INDIA: Provisions of the Arbitration Act supersede institutional arbitration rules

The Bombay High Court recently held in a judgement dated 26th February 2024 that the provisions of the (Indian) Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“Arbitration Act”) would supersede any institutional arbitration rules that parties to a contract choose by way of an arbitration agreement or clause. In the present case, two parties to a sale […]

Read More…

FRANCE: By decision n° 23-D-13 dated 19 December 2023 (the “Decision”), the French Competition Authority (the “FCA”) fined Rolex France SAS, as perpetrator, jointly and severally with Rolex Holding SA and the Hans Wilsdorf Foundation, as parent companies, a total of 91,600,000 euros for prohibiting its selected distributors from selling its luxury watches online.

This Decision follows the referrals made in January 2017 by the professional organisation Union de la Bijouterie Horlogerie and the company Pellegrin & Fils. These referrals come in the context of a dispute between Rolex France and its distributors following the network head’s wish to restructure its distribution network in France, which involves reducing the […]

Read More…

BULGARIA: New block exemption decision adopted by the Bulgarian Competition Protection Commission

On 11 January 2024, the Bulgarian Competition Protection Commission (the ‘Commission’) officially adopted a new Block Exemption Decision (the ‘Decision’) of certain categories of agreements, decisions and concerted practices. 1. Prohibited Agreements and Block Exemption Article 15 of the Bulgarian Competition Protection Act (the ‘Act’) prohibits all agreements between undertakings, decisions by associations of undertakings […]

Read More…