ROMANIA: The Romanian franchise law and the online Franchise Registry.

1. Romanian legislation regarding franchise agreements Franchise agreements in Romania are regulated by Government Ordinance No. 52/1997 as amended and completed by Law No. 179/2019. One of the main amendments introduced by Law 179/2019 refers to the creation of the Franchise Registry by the Romanian Association of Franchise, association of public utility. The Franchise Registry […]

Read More…

POLAND: An attempt to regulate the franchise market in Poland.

1.         Attempting to regulate the franchise agreement by law (the statutory regulation of the franchise agreement). 1.1.      In October 2020, at the request of the Ministry of Justice a report on franchising in Poland has been prepared. Its main scope was, inter alia, to indicate the directions in which the regulations on the franchise agreement […]

Read More…

Revision of EU VBER: IDI’s position on the draft

In July 2021, the European Commission invited interested parties to provide comments on the draft revised VBER and Vertical Guidelines by 17 September 2021. IDI, in consultation with its members and gathering input from the business community, drafted a paper which was sent to the European Commission yesterday. You can find attached the relevant document. […]

Read More…

GERMANY: Distributorship contracts according to German law.

According to established German law practice, the distributor is entitled to a claim for compensation upon the termination of the distributorship contract if the legal relationship between the distributor and the principal exceeds a simple seller-buyer-concept and the distributor is integrated tightly into the distribution network of the principal and if furthermore the distributor is […]

Read More…

FRANCE: Comments on the ruling issued by the Paris Commercial Court against SUBWAY cancelling clauses of the franchise agreement on the ground of significant imbalance.

Executive summary The case law encompasses all the ingredients of a reflection that the Franchisors and their Counsels usually have when drafting a Franchise contract. The court was severe with regard to SUBWAY, by broadening the scope of Article L. 442-6-I-2 of the French Commercial Code and by adopting often audacious solutions unfavorable to SUBWAY, […]

Read More…

AUSTRALIA: Changes to Australian franchising laws.

The reform space Whilst changes to the Code have been anticipated for some time, the exact detail has only just become legislated. Australia’s Parliamentary Joint Committee on Corporations and Financial Services released its Fairness in Franchising Report in 2019.  The Committee’s report identified weaknesses in parts of the Australian franchising sector that particularly impact small […]

Read More…

FRANCE: French Court decisions slowly aligns with the EUCJ EU Trendsetteuse case.

Paris commercial court asked for the EUCJ’s interpretation of the EU Directive of December 18, 1986, regarding the notion of “negotiation” of contracts. If the purpose of the negotiation is the conclusion of contracts on behalf of the principal, the EUCJ considers that the directive does not necessarily imply that the commercial agent can himself […]

Read More…

ARGENTINA: Important decision of Chamber X of the Labor Court of Appeals.

This decision declared that the liability of franchisor could only be claimed proving that they do not infringe Section 30 and 31 of Argentine Labor Law, which, after reviewing the facts of the case and the involvement of franchisor, were deemed not applicable. The Court of Appeals based its decision on the fact that, under the new Code, franchising is […]

Read More…

POLAND: Verdict of the Appeal Court (Sąd Apelacyjny) in Gdańsk dated 26.05.2020 r. (V AGa 21/20).

The Court of Appeal in Gdansk (the court of second instance) issued a judgment upholding the verdict of the court of first instance dismissing the agent’s suit for payment against the principal; the agent had filed the suit due to the principal’s termination of the agency agreement without notice. One of the reasons for the […]

Read More…

CHINA: Comments on the first Chinese Court decision recognizing and enforcing a foreign judgment on a franchise case on the grounds of reciprocity.

In April 2020, the Shanghai No.1 Intermediate People’s Court (the “SIPC”/上海市第一中级人民法院) issued a decision on a recognition and enforcement action ((2019) Hu 01 Xie Wai Ren No. 17/(2019) 沪01协外认17号), recognizing and enforcing a judgment made by the Seoul Southern District Court (the “SSDC”) in South Korea regarding a franchisor-franchisee dispute. This is the first time […]

Read More…

COLOMBIA: Law 2069 of 31 December 2020.

Through this law, the National Government will promote the franchise model as an alternative for entrepreneurship and expansion of “MiPYMES”.  For this purpose, the Government will regulate the technical conditions that define the franchise, the obligations and the liability regime of the franchisor and the franchisee. The technical conditions and strategies defined by the National […]

Read More…

KUWAIT: Recent Decision of Kuwait Cassation Court on time-barred plea concerning compensation claim.

INTRODUCTION One of the most important challenging legal issue that parties to the distribution agreements might encounter, has always been the question of compensation upon a premature termination, expiration or non-renewal decision of their distributorship, whether it was occurred with or without stating cause that justifies such decision. Hence, the Kuwaiti courts have for so […]

Read More…

DENMARK: Danish principal was not obliged to pay goodwill indemnification at termination of agency agreement.

The principal and the agent had agreed to a commercial agency agreement under which the principal could terminate the agreement if the agent took on other brands without the principal’s written consent. Despite the principal having accepted that the agent taking on other brands without the principal’s consent in the past, the principal could still […]

Read More…

ITALY: Critical remarks on the investigation opened by the AGCM against Benetton for abuse of economic dependence in franchising.

The proceedings arose from a complaint by Miragreen s.r.l., a former franchisee that operated two Benetton shops, which complained of having suffered an abuse of economic dependence, which allegedly led it to cease trading. On the basis of this complaint, the AGCM opened an antitrust investigation, considering that Benetton’s conduct could constitute an abuse of […]

Read More…

CHINA: Non-competition clause and agreement in a franchise business.

A recent appeal case, Xinjiang Maya Housing Brokerage Co., Ltd. v Zhao Shilei, Urumqi Intermediate, Civil Final No.495[1], provides some useful guidance for franchisor on how to secure their rights on business resources when preparing franchise agreement. In this case, Xinjiang Maya Housing Brokerage Co., Ltd. (hereinafter as “Maya Housing”), as the franchisor, entered into […]

Read More…